Tuesday, July 13, 2010

How To Make A Recommendation Letter For Community

commercial art versus art plastic Why


As enhances the beauty and harmony that creates a piece that, though not authenticated, it produces a great visual pleasure and fits perfectly into our room, library, office, versus, have a piece that does not produce the same effect, although unique and authentic. Per piece 'does not authenticate' I do not necessarily mean pieces of little economic value, but usually made by self-taught, non-formal artistic training and no more. Could the art called 'commercial' to get to thrill more than the 'art school'? I understand that there is no universal answer to this concern and that each person has their own interpretation but I would like to know your opinion.
Paco, Lima

Dear Paco, good question. The level of training of a artist determines the kind of work he does. There are artists who have studied fine arts and commercial art and there are self-learners who make works of visual art or visual art, which you call "academic art. The most famous self-taught that there is Henry Rousseau. In Peru we have artists such as José Carlos Martinat, making avant-garde art, Christian art Bendayan Pop artist, and Susan Torres, who makes conceptual art, political art and pop art, who had no formal training, however, make it work arts and are considered good performers. The largest self-taught artist from Peru may have been Mario Urteaga.

commercial works are pictures landscapes, still lifes or abstract that the main reason why they were made is to decorate. The main function of a work of art is to give an emotion, based on creativity. The price of commercial art in many cases is more expensive than the plastic arts, because there are commercial galleries selling paintings at $ 3,000 U.S. and a lower price you can buy a good work of an artist. Another difference is that the price of a work of art rises over time. An emerging artist becomes recognized and the price of his works up many times more than it did originally, which is not about commercial art. To give an example Tilsa Tsuchiya (photo, The Myth of Red Warrior) sold their works at $ 4.000 U.S. now his works are sold at U.S. $ 120.000 in the auction houses of New York. As a general rule, the price of a regular artist triples in 15 years. If an artist is to be recognized, can be multiplied by 30 in 20 years. In the end, the early purchase of works by a good artist is a very good investment. I think there

commercial art if you can get to thrill, but the plastic art to make you surprise and sometimes inexplicable emotion. In addition, it was found that the visual art takes the stress, you can work harder and less tiring. Another difference between commercial art and fine art is that art gives plastic personality to the environment, but commercial art and decorating just another object, like a lamp or table. It is bad enough commercial work at home, buy what you like, you can move more than the fine arts, that's no problem, a matter of taste. However, I believe that before a purchase a work is favorable to go to museums, galleries and see what's there to appreciate the differences. The beauty and harmony that takes the values \u200b\u200bthe work and if you are happy with commercial work, keep buying. Thanks for your question Paco, I hope I have clarified your concerns with my answer. Augusto

Chimpan

0 comments:

Post a Comment